Although, don’t get us wrong, the Arlo Pro is a solid camera too and it might be just a perfect video monitoring solution for your home. After all, who wants to overpay for the smart features they’ll never need to use?
So, before we compare the Arlo Pro vs. Arlo Pro 2, let’s clarify a few things. If you’re familiar with the Arlo wireless cameras, feel free to use the article navigation below to jump to the right section. However, if you’re new to Arlo, — we really suggest you keep reading.
The Arlo Pro 2 camera is one of the best wireless cameras on the market, and the Ring Stick Up Cam just received a revamp that makes it a worthy competitor. Which camera is best is really going to depend on what you’re looking for when it comes to video monitoring.
The Power over Ethernet features of the Ring Stick Up Cam Wired make it one of our favorite options on the market, but at the same time, the AC & Battery option with Arlo makes it a good buy as well. Regardless of your choice, you’ll likely be more than happy with the features each brand has to offer.
Both cameras have their pros and cons, and we’ll go into detail while comparing the Arlo Pro 2 vs. Ring Stick Up Cam (New). Read on below for the big picture, or use our navigation bar to jump directly to the sections you care about most.
Some cameras have the ability to record all of the activity they see 24/7, which allows you to rewind the footage to any point during the day and make sure you’re not missing anything important. This feature is known as continuous video recording (CVR) and is offered either using cloud or local storage depending on the type of camera.
When it comes to smart cameras, CVR is offered as a separate subscription due to the large amount of resources it uses to store than amount of data. Motion-triggered recording is far less expensive than CVR, but having the option for 24/7 recording is great for those who need non-stop footage of everything that is happening within their home. CVR bypasses the flaw of a “cool-off” time that many motion-triggered recordings have that can potentially lead to the exclusion of important information.
Not every smart camera is a continuous video recording camera, but we’ve compiled the best of the ones that are to help you choose a model that will work for you.
Most smart cameras offer a lot of the same features, but a lot of them are intended solely for keeping an eye on the inside of your home. There aren’t quite as many models that are intended to work outside, but the Nest Outdoor IQ and the Arlo Pro 2 are some of the best. Both cameras have their pros and cons, so it’s difficult to determine the best — but for severe weather, there’s no bearing the Nest Cam IQ Outdoor.
Nest and Arlo are some of the biggest names in the smart camera industry, and these two specific models are some of the best the brands have to offer. From a durability standpoint, the Nest is better, but it’s also much more expensive. Arlo adds in some features like a siren, limited free cloud storage, and local backup, making it an excellent option for those looking for a more affordable price.
Below, we take a look at the Nest Outdoor IQ vs. Arlo Pro 2 to give you a sense of what both cameras have to offer. Read on for the full story, or use our navigation bar to jump right to what you’d like to know.
Arlo is one of the more premium brands on the market, and the Arlo Pro 2 is one of the company’s most impressive models. However, the impending release of the Arlo Ultra provides a step up in quality — albeit at a pretty expensive price. Which device is better for you is going to depend on whether you think the extra features are worth the price.
While the Arlo Ultra has yet to release, it’s already clear that it’s going to be one of the best options on the market for home video monitoring. Arlo has already proven with their Arlo Pro and Arlo Pro 2 that they can provide a premium experience, and the Arlo Ultra will be one of the first smart cameras to record security footage in 4K. That quality comes at a price, but for many the improvements may be worth it.
Below we compare the Arlo Ultra vs. Arlo Pro 2 to hopefully help make the shopping process a little bit easier. Read on below for a comprehensive review, or jump right down to a specific section using our navigation bar.
Are Arlo’s extra features worth the price? Maybe. However, the lack of the ability to record live view with the Blink XT is a major downfall that is just too big to ignore, making the Arlo Pro 2 a better option in our book despite the extra cost.
Blink cameras offer some basic video monitoring features at a pretty accessible price, but there are some missing features that really hold it back from competing with other cameras near the price point. With that said, there are some good points to the Blink XT such as the temperature sensor and the free cloud storage. It’s definitely a viable option, we just don’t think it quite keeps up with the Arlo Pro 2’s host of features.
This is also basically comparing a more premium camera to a lower end model, so to be fair, the cards were stacked against Blink from the beginning. Although, you might not need all those extra features and the Blink XT might be just the right smart camera for your home.
So, let’s go into detail with a comparison of the Blink XT vs. Arlo Pro 2 to see what each camera has to offer. Read the whole article for a full picture, or use our navigation bar to jump directly to the sections you care about most.
Arlo has produced some seriously impressive camera solutions, and their product lineup continues to expand with bigger and better options for home video monitoring. The Arlo Q and Arlo Pro 2 are both excellent cameras in their own right, and it’s difficult to give a clear answer as to which one is the best overall. If you’re looking for an outdoor camera, there’s no doubt that the Arlo Pro 2 is your best bet, while the Arlo Q provides quality indoor monitoring without the need for a base station.
There are a lot of aspects that these two cameras have in common, but there are actually a significant number of differences too. Perhaps the most notable change when comparing the two devices is that the Arlo Pro 2 requires a base station to function. This is a little inconvenient and is an extra expense, but it also enables a number of features that are straight-up absent on the Arlo Q. With that said, the Arlo Q still pulls ahead in certain areas like dual-band WiFi and better motion detection.
Ultimately, the best choice is going to depend on what you’re looking for in a smart camera. Below we go into detail on the similarities and differences of the Arlo Q vs. Arlo Pro 2 to help make the decision a little easier, but feel free to use our navigation bar to jump directly to the sections you care about most.
Do you want your smart cameras to use local or cloud storage? Or, maybe both? In this article we’ll do an in-depth comparison between the Reolink Argus 2 vs. Arlo Pro 2 to help you choose the right one for your home. Feel free to navigate this article with the links below, though in this case you might miss out on some peculiar details that we bring up about the cameras in other sections. So, buckle up!