Anova Nano vs. Bluetooth — Differences Explained

Anova Nano vs. Bluetooth

Anova Nano vs. Bluetooth

Sous Vide offers an excellent way to evenly cook food, and like many other types of electronics, the advent of smart technology has shown us the incredible capabilities that these coolers have to offer. When comparing the Anova Nano vs. Bluetooth, it’s clear that both options have their benefits and drawbacks. We feel the Nano is the better option for the average home cook, although the Bluetooth model is a little sturdier has its own perks as well.

When deciding between the Nano and the Bluetooth models, you’re essentially making some choices between easier accessibility and affordability and more cooking power. The Nano does a great job with hands-free operation and a less expensive price tag, while the Bluetooth model is sturdier and offers better heating.

Below, we dive deep into the details of these two sous vide cookers. Read on for the full picture, or use the navigation bar to jump right to the comparisons that interest you most.

Anova Bluetooth vs. Wifi — What’s the Difference?

Anova Bluetooth Display

Anova Bluetooth vs. Wifi

Today, we’ll compare two of the leading sous vide cookers from Anova Culinary: the 1st Gen Anova Culinary Bluetooth Sous Vide Precision Cooker (Bluetooth only) and the 2nd Generation Anova Sous Vide Precision Cooker (Wifi + Bluetooth).

How these sous vides connect isn’t the only thing that makes these two different from one another. So let’s dive into the differences!

You might be interested in our new take on Anova Nano vs. Bluetooth.